Equity, Loan-to-Value, and Amortization: Swiss Mortgage Financing Explained
Swiss mortgage financing follows three clearly defined basic rules. Anyone who understands equity, loan-to-value, and amortization knows the entire foundation — and can speak with the bank and the broker on equal footing.
Equity — the 20 Percent Rule
In Switzerland, banks finance a maximum of 80 percent of a property's value through a mortgage. Buyers must contribute the remaining 20 percent as equity. Of that, at most half may come from the pension fund or Pillar 3a — a minimum of 10 percent in hard equity outside of retirement savings is mandatory.
Loan-to-Value — How High Can the Mortgage Be?
Loan-to-value is the ratio between the mortgage and the property's value. With a purchase price of CHF 1,000,000 and a mortgage of CHF 800,000, the loan-to-value is 80 percent. Within that 80 percent, banks distinguish between a first mortgage (up to 65 percent loan-to-value) and a second mortgage (from 65 to 80 percent), which must be amortized without exception.
Amortization — the Repayment Obligation
The second mortgage (15 percent of the property's value) must be paid down to 65 percent loan-to-value within 15 years or by retirement — whichever comes first. Two paths are available for this: direct amortization (annual repayment to the bank) or indirect amortization (payments into a Pillar 3a account, which later pays off the second mortgage).
Direct vs. Indirect Amortization
Direct amortization immediately reduces the debt and interest burden. Until 2028, it is less tax-attractive than the indirect variant, because it reduces debt interest deductions. With the abolition of imputed rental value from 2029, this logic shifts — direct amortization becomes more attractive again in many cases. Indirect amortization via Pillar 3a combines the debt interest deduction with tax-privileged retirement savings, and is often the most economical path under the current tax regime.
How These Three Levers Interact
Anyone who contributes more equity lowers the loan-to-value and thereby reduces the interest and amortization obligation. Anyone who instead keeps equity available for other investments accepts higher housing costs. This trade-off is individual — and belongs in sound financial planning before every property purchase.
FAQ
Related Topics
Personal Consultation
Would you like a personal consultation? Our experts in Zurich and Zug will advise you free of charge and without obligation on your individual situation. Fair, transparent, and personal — since 2017. Book an appointment · [email protected]